The docs contradict themselves here :-)
On Sep 12, 2014, at 6:27 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > The docs, I believe. > > Robby > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Patrick Useldinger > <uselpa.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> according to the documentation, the above procedure accepts a *number* and >> returns an integer. >> >> But (at least in Racket 6.1) there's an error message stating that the >> parameter needs to be an *integer*: >> >> --------------------------------------- >>> (integer-sqrt 151.29) >> integer-sqrt: contract violation >> expected: integer? >> given: 151.29 >> --------------------------------------- >> >> Is this an error in the documentation or in the implementation? >> >> Regards, >> -Patrick >> ____________________ >> Racket Users list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
