On 2014-08-12 12:39:57 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: > B.: I don't see what you mean. Why does DrRacket know better than TR > how to format TR types?
FWIW, if there are width limitations in the widget that DrRacket shows the type information, DrRacket may be able to pretty-print s-expressions better to fit than strings. Also, as far as TR is concerned it doesn't matter that much if it outputs s-exps or strings since internally we just pretty-print types as s-exps in a mostly standard way anyway (aside from indentation rules). Cheers, Asumu ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
