On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Alexander D. Knauth <alexan...@knauth.org> wrote: > > On Jul 20, 2014, at 1:56 PM, Jon Zeppieri <zeppi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I feel like this has come up before, but I can't seem to find the >> discussion in the archive. > > Was this what you were thinking of? > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2013-November/060427.html > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2013-November/060429.html > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2013-November/060430.html > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2013-November/060433.html > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2013-November/060437.html >
I think so, yes. But since everyone is agreed that this is a bad idea, I'll go a different route. I'm perfectly happy to raise an exception inside the procedure. Is raise-argument-error the preferred way? ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
