On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Brian Adkins <racketus...@lojic.com> wrote: > > The various match-lambdas got me closer. I haven't found one w/o an extra set > of [ ] or ( ) yet, but if I don't, I think I can make a macro for it after > gaining some experience to allow the following: > > (define foo > (my-match-lambda ((arg1 _ arg2) arg3) > (bar arg1 arg2 arg3))) > > instead of: > > (define foo > (match-lambda* [(list (list arg1 _ arg2) arg3) > (bar arg1 arg2 arg3)]))
You may want to take a look at `define/match`: (define/match (foo a b) [((arg1 _ arg2) arg3) (bar arg1 arg2 arg3)]) Sam ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
