I agree that the answer should be #t and serialization to bytecode is wrong to change the result. I'll look into the problem sometime soon.
At Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:16:46 -0700, Eric Dobson wrote: > What should the following program return? > > #lang racket > (syntax? (cdr (syntax-e #'(2 . ())))) > > If I just run the program with 'racket' I get #t. If I compile it with > 'raco make' and run it again I get #f. > > I'm trying to figure out how to type this in TR, and thought I fully > understood how pairs and syntax objects interacted but this change (by > the serialization?) violates my understanding. > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
