No, it's an idea and nothing else.
On May 11, 2014, at 9:13 PM, Andrew Dudash wrote: > > We have discussed making the successor of Racket (Racket II) > > There's a successor in the works? > > > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Norman Gray <nor...@astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote: > > Matthias, greetings. > > This is a minor tangent to a very interesting thread... > > On 2014 May 11, at 22:24, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > > 3. Well, minor point but when you state that "I am aware of > > only three other languages developed in a similar context: > > OCaml, Haskell, and Scala." please do keep in mind that > > GHC is a Microsoft product, [...] > > This remark caught my eye. That's not the impression given by > <https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/TeamGHC>, which lists only two > Microsoft folk, and seems to include a pretty even (and healthy) mix of > university and commercial affiliations. > > It's interesting there are no Glasgow folk listed (and though I'm from > Glasgow I don't have any inside information here). > > All the best, > > Norman > > > -- > Norman Gray : http://nxg.me.uk > SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK > > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
