Would it make sense for will executors [^1] to have a definition of
"unreachability" that includes GC, as now, but also immanent program
termination (and they run automatically on termination)?

Will executors have a per-"object" granularity. That seems like how
you'd usually prefer to express it -- and best for organizing and
maintaining code, and using third-party modules that cooperate
smoothly?


[^1]: http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/willexecutor.html
____________________
  Racket Users list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Reply via email to