Please disregard, this makes no sense. How would the code refer to functions that may or may not exist? I forgot the macro was just converting a call like (get-function 'name) directly into allowing (name), so ultimately some sort of lookup is needed.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Sean Kanaley <skana...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have: > > 1. a macro to define functions > > (define-syntax the-macro > ... > #'(define (name) ...)) > > 2. a file filled with "user" definitions in expression form > > (this is a definition that shall be passed to the macro) > (so is this) > ... > > 3. I would like to do something to the effect of > > (define-namespace-anchor nsa) > (with-input-from-file ... > (λ () > (eval `(the-macro ,@(read)) > (namespace-anchor->namespace nsa)))) > > which works, but then I cannot provide the defined functions as they > happen at phase runtime compile shift meta 34 (?). Is there some way to > sort of pre-run the file reading so the definitions already exist for > exporting? >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
