It's fast for me - Linux Mint, both Racket 6.0 and 6.0.1.5 (from git
just now) with cairo 2.11200.2.
Dave
On 04/21/2014 11:10 AM, Laurent wrote:
My version of Cairo is 2.11000.2. What's yours, Sean?
(probably: ls /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libcairo.so*)
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Robby Findler
<ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu <mailto:ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu>> wrote:
If the versions of Cairo are the same, then that eliminates one
possible route of inquiry.
Robby
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Laurent <laurent.ors...@gmail.com
<mailto:laurent.ors...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Thanks Sean.
> (I forgot to mention that I was testing on Racket 6.0.1.4).
> Apparently it does not lag on your machine, so it might be
particular to my
> machine then? Strange.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Sean Kanaley
<skana...@gmail.com <mailto:skana...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Here's my log after pasting the source into command-line racket
6.0,
>> Ubuntu 12.04 32-bit:
>>
>> to-draw at 1649
>>
>> to-draw: cpu time: 0 real time: 2 gc time: 0
>> on-key a at 2934
>> to-draw at 2934
>>
>> to-draw: cpu time: 0 real time: 2 gc time: 0
>> on-key s at 2970
>> to-draw at 2970
>>
>> to-draw: cpu time: 4 real time: 3 gc time: 0
>> on-key d at 3044
>> on-key f at 3044
>> to-draw at 3045
>>
>> to-draw: cpu time: 0 real time: 0 gc time: 0
>> to-draw at 3069
>> to-draw: cpu time: 0 real time: 1 gc time: 0
>> on-key a at 3198
>> on-key s at 3198
>> to-draw at 3199
>>
>> to-draw: cpu time: 4 real time: 3 gc time: 0
>> to-draw at 3329
>>
>> to-draw: cpu time: 4 real time: 1 gc time: 0
>> to-draw at 3392
>> to-draw: cpu time: 0 real time: 1 gc time: 0
>> on-key g at 3430
>> on-key j at 3430
>> on-key k at 3430
>> to-draw at 3430
>>
>> to-draw: cpu time: 4 real time: 1 gc time: 0
>> to-draw at 3467
>> to-draw: cpu time: 0 real time: 1 gc time: 0
>> on-key a at 3504
>> on-key l at 3504
>> to-draw at 3505
>>
>> to-draw: cpu time: 0 real time: 1 gc time: 0
>> to-draw at 3547
>>
>> to-draw: cpu time: 4 real time: 1 gc time: 0
>> to-draw at 3572
>> to-draw: cpu time: 0 real time: 1 gc time: 0
>> on-key h at 3602
>> to-draw at 3602
>> to-draw: cpu time: 0 real time: 1 gc time: 0
>> on-key k at 3659
>> on-key ; at 3659
>> to-draw at 3659
>>
>> to-draw: cpu time: 4 real time: 3 gc time: 0
>> to-draw at 3689
>>
>> to-draw: cpu time: 0 real time: 1 gc time: 0
>> to-draw at 3725
>>
>> to-draw: cpu time: 0 real time: 1 gc time: 0
>> to-draw at 3776
>> to-draw: cpu time: 0 real time: 1 gc time: 0
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Laurent
<laurent.ors...@gmail.com <mailto:laurent.ors...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a 2htdp/universe program that used to run fast enough a
few months
>>> ago, but now it is very slow and not usable.
>>> The slowness seems to be because of the on-screen rendering,
and not
>>> because of the generation of the image.
>>>
>>> Here is a stripped-down version that shows this behavior:
>>> https://gist.github.com/Metaxal/11142941
>>>
>>> In the following log, you see that the `on-key` events are
very close one
>>> to the other (in milliseconds after the beginning of the
program), but the
>>> corresponding `to-draw` events are separated by more than a
second, even
>>> though generating the image (cpu time) takes almost no time:
>>>
>>> on-key a at 6906
>>> on-key u at 6912
>>> on-key i at 6912
>>> on-key e at 6913
>>> to-draw at 6913
>>> to-draw: cpu time: 4 real time: 3 gc time: 0
>>> to-draw at 8598
>>> to-draw: cpu time: 4 real time: 2 gc time: 0
>>> to-draw at 11948
>>> to-draw: cpu time: 4 real time: 2 gc time: 0
>>> to-draw at 13631
>>> to-draw: cpu time: 0 real time: 2 gc time: 0
>>> to-draw at 161839
>>> to-draw: cpu time: 4 real time: 9 gc time: 0
>>>
>>> During those long seconds, Xorg is almost at 100% cpu.
>>>
>>> However, using an empty scene instead of an image is fast.
>>> The time also depends on the size of the grid.
>>>
>>> I'm using Ubuntu 12.04 64bits.
>>> I have tried to replicate the behavior on older versions of
racket (5.3.1
>>> and 5.90.0.9) but it's the same. So maybe the problem is not
on Racket's
>>> side but something has changed in Ubuntu?
>>>
>>> Does anyone else see the same behavior, either on the same
platform or on
>>> a different one?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Laurent
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________
>>> Racket Users list:
>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>>
>>
>
>
> ____________________
> Racket Users list:
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
