This would be highly anomalous. Python is usually at least 10 times slower than Racket for most tasks.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Cristian Baboi <cristian.ba...@gmail.com>wrote: > În data de Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:41:06 +0200, Neil Toronto < > neil.toro...@gmail.com> a scris: > > > On 02/27/2014 08:33 AM, Cristian Baboi wrote: >> >>> În data de Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:04:51 +0200, Neil Toronto >>> <neil.toro...@gmail.com> a scris: >>> >>> On 02/27/2014 07:55 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote: >>>> >>>>> 2014-02-27 15:23 GMT+01:00 Cristian Baboi <cristian.ba...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>> > >> Your changes give the same running time as my version: ~ 3 min on my >>> computer in DrRacket. >>> >> >> How fast are your beatnik friends' implementations? >> >> > A few seconds on Intel i5 or core2duo in python or java ... > > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
