The macro noob (me) is experimenting with a macro that operates on define. I
understand how to match the three common forms of define:
(define-syntax (define/foo stx)
(syntax-case stx ()
[(_ (name arg ... . rest-arg) body ...)
#'(omitted)]
[(_ (name arg ...) body ...)
#'(omitted)]
[(_ name body ...)
#'(omitted)]))
But how do I handle curried function definitions? Since they can be nested to
arbitrary depth, I'm puzzled. Is there a way to match them directly in
syntax-case? Or do I need a preliminary step of converting them into the basic
define form, like so:
(define/foo (((bar a) b) c)
(+ a b c))
(define/foo bar
(λ(a) (λ(b) (λ(c) (+ a b c)))))
... and then send them through the syntax-case I've already got.
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
