I've finally tracked down this bug in the macro expander and pushed a repair. Thanks for the (extra) example!
At Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:57:06 +0100, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote: > Hi, > > Ah! Okay, with (all-from-out "def.rkt") my example works in racket. > > In DrRacket I get: > > racket/collects/compiler/cm.rkt:430:6: write: unsealed > local-definition or module > context found in syntax object > > /Jens Axel > > > 2014-02-04 Ryan Culpepper <ry...@ccs.neu.edu>: > > On 02/04/2014 11:45 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote: > >> > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I have attempted to define a shorthand for define like this: > >> > >> (define-syntax def (make-rename-transformer #'define)) > >> > >> For most purposes it seems to work, but I have problems with > >> all-defined-out. > >> > >> soegaard$ cat def.rkt > >> #lang racket > >> (provide (all-defined-out) def) > >> (define-syntax def (make-rename-transformer #'define)) > >> > >> soegaard$ cat bug.rkt > >> #lang racket > >> (require "def.rkt") > >> (provide (all-defined-out)) > >> > >> soegaard$ ~/racket-jan-30/racket/racket/bin/racket > >> Welcome to Racket v6.0.0.1. > >>> > >>> (require "bug.rkt") > >>> (def x 42) > >> > >> def: undefined; > >> cannot reference undefined identifier > >> context...: > >> > >> > /Users/soegaard/racket-jan-30/racket/racket/collects/racket/private/misc.rkt:87: > 7 > >> > >> Am I misusing make-rename-transformer or is this supposed to work? > > > > > > In bug.rkt: (all-defined-out) only includes names defined in that module. > > You probably want (all-from-out "def.rkt") instead. > > > > Ryan > > > > > > -- > -- > Jens Axel Søgaard > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
