A few minutes ago, Scott Klarenbach wrote:
> Thanks Eli. Since I can say #lang at-exp racket/base,
(That's because it extends the `racket/base' reader.)
> I assumed that if "my-lang.rkt" exports all of racket-base that it
> would work. But I suppose that is because racket/base acts as a
> module language and a reader, and that when I export it from my
> module language I'm missing the key ingredient?
That's very close: the ingredient that you're missing is that just
re-providing all of the functionality of `racket/base' doesn't export
its reader. This is because the reader lives in a different level,
not as some provided function.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
