I have considered making them prefab instead Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 16, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think the conversion function is useful pedagogically to talk about > the need to serialize, but having it just work might be expedient in > other situations. I do not believe that they are actually > serializable, but we could fairly easily make that change. > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Matthias Felleisen > <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> >> Kind of. If this is about Universe programming (so that students can send >> messages back and forth), I have them write conversion functions: >> >> (define-struct hh (cakes henries)) >> >> (define (hh->lists hh) >> (list (cakes->lists (hh-cakes hh)) (henries->lists (hh-henries hh)))) >> >> -- Matthias >> >> >> >> >>> On Nov 16, 2013, at 11:57 AM, n...@cs.tufts.edu (Norman Ramsey) wrote: >>> >>> A structure is defined with `define-struct` in Intermediate Student >>> Language. >>> Is it serializable? That is, can it be written and then re-read >>> successfully with `write` and `read`? If not, is there a way to make it so? >>> (I have found the function `make-serialize-info` in the racket/serialize >>> library, but the documentation relies on Racket concepts that I have not >>> yet learned.) >>> >>> >>> Norman >>> ____________________ >>> Racket Users list: >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >> >> >> ____________________ >> Racket Users list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > > > > -- > Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> > Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University > http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay > > "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
