On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > That doesn't sound like the right conclusion to me from this particular > evidence. I'm not sure if I'm falling for the "easy semantics" dream here, > but "update = remove + install" sounds really nice. (So would "update = > remove + remove-all-deps + install" tho. :)
Here's another data point for why I think this is problematic: the `rwind` package prompts the user and installs some config files when installed. Updating it shouldn't run this again just to update some of the code. Sam ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
