On 2013-08-07 08:55:17 -0700, Eric Dobson wrote: > That doesn't solve the issue. The issue is not in struct/c and thus > using struct/dc has the same problem. A immutable field cannot have a > impersonator contract applied to it because that would be equivalent > to mutating the field.
You're right, and the immutability restriction is enforced at the level of impersonators/chaperones, so it doesn't look like there's an easy way around this. Hmm. Cheers, Asumu ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
