Err... While trying to upgrade to 5.3.4.11 on a different ubuntu computer (this time 64bits OS), I get the following error:
% racket Welcome to Racket v5.3.4.11. standard-module-name-resolver: collection not found for module path: (submod (lib "racket/init") configure-runtime) collection: "racket" in collection directories: /home/orseau/.racket/5.3.4.1/pkgs/installed/slideshow-latex /home/orseau/.racket/5.3.4.11/collects /usr/lib/racket-5.3.4.11/collects context...: show-collection-err standard-module-name-resolver /home/orseau/.racketrc:3:0: #%top-interaction: unbound identifier; also, no #%app syntax transformer is bound at: #%top-interaction in: (#%top-interaction require readline/rep) standard-module-name-resolver: collection not found for module path: racket/base collection: "racket" in collection directories: /home/orseau/.racket/5.3.4.1/pkgs/installed/slideshow-latex /home/orseau/.racket/5.3.4.11/collects /usr/lib/racket-5.3.4.11/collects context...: show-collection-err standard-module-name-resolver This is weird. Looks like it searches for the `racket' collection in my personal collections... Am I really alone to have problems with this version?! FWIW, on the computer of the first email, it works if I compile it from source. Laurent On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Laurent <laurent.ors...@gmail.com> wrote: > Huh, actually, it *does* fail to install! > I thought I had picked the wrong version (switching computers too many > times...) but I had not. > It's a 64bits processor on a 32bits Ubuntu, and the installation fails > with the above message. > > If I choose a non-Unix-style installation, the installation works, but > launching DrRacket fails with the same error: > % /usr/racket-5.3.4.11/bin/drracket > /usr/racket-5.3.4.11/bin/gracket: 1: /usr/racket-5.3.4.11/bin/gracket: ELF > : not found > /usr/racket-5.3.4.11/bin/gracket: 7: /usr/racket-5.3.4.11/bin/gracket: > Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string > > This does not occur with 5.3.4.10 > > Any hint? > > Laurent > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Laurent <laurent.ors...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Then don't bother too much. >> Though if you want to do something maybe you can just target >> the most popular distributions maybe and leave the rest as is. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: >> >>> 10 minutes ago, Laurent wrote: >>> > Ahem, picked the wrong 32/64bits version... Sorry for the noise. >>> > Maybe there could be a simple check in the installation file that >>> > issues a warning whenever the machine's architecture is different >>> > from the installer's? Though since very few people seem to complain >>> > about this, that's probably no big deal. >>> >>> It's might be doable if there's a good way to know if you're on 64 or >>> on 32 bit OS. The problem is that the installer is using only very >>> basic things. I've so far avoided such things since it's roughly >>> similar to going down the bottomless pit of checking libc versions etc >>> etc etc. >>> >>> -- >>> ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: >>> http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! >>> >> >> >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
