On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Ryan Culpepper <ry...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > Note, however, that the syntax class now uses #:attr instead of #:with. > That's the main usability issue I'm worried about with this change. > Following with-syntax's lead, a #:with clause automatically converts its > right-hand side to syntax---even if the result is "3D". That means that if > you forget that step of the conversion to laziness, you'll probably get > bizarre 3D syntax. I could change #:with to raise an error in some/all 3D > cases, but that might break existing programs. > > Is anyone out there using syntax-parse to make 3D syntax?
I'm sure all the places where I do this are bugs (and it has happened to me), so I'd welcome this error. Sam ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
