Thanks!
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid <nad...@acm.org> wrote: > Ok ok. :-) I will try to work on it in the next day or so if no one else > gets to it first. > --- nadeem > > > On Wednesday, May 22, 2013, Laurent wrote: > >> (actually double-quote, double-quote, backspace is more efficient, but >> just typing double-quote would be so much simpler, in particular because >> when I need this, I need it often, e.g. in slideshow) >> >> >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:18 PM, John Clements <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org >> > wrote: >> >>> >>> On May 22, 2013, at 7:07 AM, Laurent wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > The new behavior of automatic parenthesis matching is really nice, but >>> there is one problem with string quotes. >>> > For example, if the cursor is in the middle of a string and I type the >>> string-quote symbol ", it places a quote which cuts the current string and >>> leaves the right part in a bad syntax. >>> > >>> > Most of the time, when I type a quote inside a string, it's because I >>> want to split the string in two parts. >>> > To do that, I have to type string-quote, string-quote, delete (to >>> remove the extra string-quote added by the paren-match behavior), and left >>> to go back between the two strings, which is mildly annoying. >>> > >>> > Would it be possible (unless problematic) to have the default >>> paren-match behavior for strings that splits the string instead of >>> inserting a single string-quote, possibly unless the left symbol is a >>> backslash? >>> >>> +1. I've developed a reflex to compensate for this, which is >>> double-quote double-quote double-quote delete left-arrow… which is a bit >>> painful. >>> >>> John >>> >>> >> > > -- > Sent from Gmail Mobile > Nadeem Abdul Hamid > http://cs.berry.edu/nhamid >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
