On Apr 4, 2013, at 6:48 PM, Lindsey Kuper wrote: > lambdaLVar is a minimal substrate for LVars, but it's not > too pleasant to write programs in (although the #lang decoupling could > help).
That's why I proposed a #lang lambdaLVar in the first place. You might be able to get all of Racket's infrastructure into your language -- meaning you can write and demo real programs. Which is what you want when you design a language -- Matthias ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
