Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Diogo F. S. Ramos <[email protected]> > wrote: >> All the tests should be checked, even if some fail, but if some fail, >> there is a non-0 value returned. >> >> Is this possible? > > Implementing this change in rackunit would be difficult. Currently > rackunit tests are modular and disconnected from one another. What you > are imagine requires the "last one" (in this file? in this call to > raco test?) to see if any of the others beforehand had a problem and > exit with non-0 if they did. > > If you want to write a different program, then something like the > existing rackunit/text-ui might be appropriate, where it gets a tree > of non-modular tests and does some analysis on the result of > everything. I personally find this form of rackunit usage to be a pain > to deal with and prefer the modular approach.
Thank you. `rackunit/text-ui' looks interesting and I'll investigate it. My backup plan is to write a filter that will wrap around `raco test ...'. It will then output everything `raco test ...' outputs but will heuristically look for failures, like the word "FAILURE" or the phrase "Check failure", returning non-0 values accordingly. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
