2013/1/31 Carl Eastlund <c...@ccs.neu.edu>:
> Piotr,
>
> This isn't good Racket code, it's *gorgeous*. That was my impression at
> first glance, and the more I look, the more I like it. Your Bezier library
> absolutely does not read like the code of a novice Racketeer. Few enough
> people regularly use a combination of objects, pattern matching, map, cut,
> macros, contracts, named let, multiple values, submodules... let alone using
> them all in readable and idiomatic fashion.
I agree with this. Welcome to the club.
I see that in the hunt for performance, you have used macros
as a form of "manual inlining". It might be worth to experiment
with fl+, fl* and friends, since they don't need to handle other
number types, they might give you some extra performance.
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/flonums.html
--
Jens Axel Søgaard
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
