Thanks to both of you! Those are two nice solutions that I didn't know
about.
On 04.01.13 21:21, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
If the original and user code are in different modules, you can use
`provide' with `rename-out' or `require' with `rename-in'.
Vincent
At Fri, 04 Jan 2013 20:52:36 +0100,
Philipp Dikmann wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm trying to expose a module's functionality to the user via a macro
that will let them use 'short-hand' names for the provided functions.
Yet I want to keep the 'long' names inside the original code for
clarity. The code below will not work - because of macro hygiene - but
demonstrates the intention. How would you approach this?
#lang racket
(provide with-timesten)
(define (timesten x)
(* x 10))
(define-syntax with-timesten
(syntax-rules ()
[(_ body ...) (let ([tt timesten])
(begin
body ...))]))
;; ... so the user can do:
(with-timesten
(tt 1)
(tt 2)
(tt 3))
Best regards,
Philipp
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
