How about this:
(match "This is a 40.2 Song about Japan"
[(regexp #px"([\\D]*)([\\d]+\\.[\\d]+)([\\D]*)" (list _ x y z))
(list x y z)])
;; produces
'("This is a " "40.2" " Song about Japan")
The `_` is ignoring the first result of `regexp-match`, which is the full match.
Sam
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Galler <lzgal...@optonline.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a destructuring-bind for regular expressions?
>
> Something along the lines of the purely fictional function
> "with-destructuring-regex", below:
>
> (with-destructuring-regex ([(list #px"[\\D]*" #px"[\\d]+\\.[\\d]+"
> #px"[\\D]*") "This is a 40.2 Song about Japan" (x y z)])
> (values x y z))
>
> ;->
> ;"This is a "
> ;"40.2"
> ;"Song about Japan"
>
> This seems very much like something Danny would have implemented at some
> point in time.
>
> If the answer is no, I'll just go ahead and code it and share results, if
> of interest.
>
> Thanks much.
>
> Zack
> ____________________
> Racket Users list:
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
