Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <samth@...> writes: > > While you're certainly right about DrRacket introducing noise in > performance measurement, I don't think you need to generate an > executable to eliminate that overhead. Simply running `racket` from > the command line on a file in a module ought to be sufficient. > > Sam
Hello Sam. I am using racket from the console, not using DrRacket. I just copy the code with control-c and paste with control-v then wait a seconds for the definitions to be loaded in memory and then run the test. I was going to use raco exce ... but it asks about a module (perhaps I should read the section about using raco to generate a standalone executable). Anyway, my point was that I was expecting something more from typed racket. Since typed racket use types (like declaring type in sbcl) I was expected better perfomance, that's all. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
