It actually _is_ in my PATH already: > (find-executable-path "javaw.exe") #<path:C:\Windows\system32\javaw.exe> > (getenv "PATH") "...;C:\\Windows\\system32;..."
(Other members of PATH omitted.) Weird, huh? Something is wonky. I even tried changing the capitalization of "system" on the off chance that case mattered, but nope. Ben: Thanks for the ref. I should have thought to look at the C code. (Would Racket blinders cause Racket to ignore some of its own code? ;-) ) On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Danny Yoo <d...@hashcollision.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Tim Nelson <tbnel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for the hint Danny. I didn't know about that function... but I'm >> sorry to say that >> >> > (find-executable-path "java.exe") >> #f >> >> whereas from cmd: >> > where java >> C:\Windows\System32\java.exe >> >> so the command line knows about it, and I can use it, but it is concealed >> from Racket, even via find-executable-path. That's probably a more concise >> statement of my problem! >> >> > Ugh. Ok, that was _supposed_ to work. > > Out of curiosity, what happens if you add C:\Windows\System32 to your PATH? > > (I know that's not the right solution, and it sounds like there's some > Windows weirdness involved here.) >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
