Worth noting that last month, Nov '12, the triple digit stratosphere was broached.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Joe Marshall <jmarsh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > I don't object to the silliness, I object to it being called a measure! > The number that shows up on the search results page is a pure > guess made by a part of the system that doesn't have access to > the actual index. Really, Google Trends is a much better tool. > http://www.google.com/trends/explore#cat=0-5-31&q=Racket&cmpt=q > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:30 AM, John Clements > <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org>wrote: > >> Before Joe points it out: yes, this is a silly measure. And yet, it >> appears to be (a substantial component of) the TIOBE index--another silly >> measure. The actual news is this: Using google's "verbatim" results, the >> query +"Racket Programming" is reported as having "About 360,000 results". >> Given that last month's result was something like 20K, I'm a wee bit >> suspicious. However, I'm never one to look a gift horse in the mouth. >> >> Merry Christmas! >> >> John >> >> >> ____________________ >> Racket Users list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >> >> > > > -- > ~jrm > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
