On 2012-11-28 11:48:45 -0500, David Van Horn wrote:
> I'm sure this possible and probably not difficult, but I thought I'd
> throw it out there for feedback.
If you do something like this:
#lang racket
(module test racket
(require rackunit)
(check-equal? 5 2))
(begin-for-syntax
(require (submod "." test)))
then it will work with the "check syntax" button. Background expansion doesn't
print the rackunit output though, it seems. If it did, I think that's all you'd
need.
Also, this doesn't work if you use a `module*` or `module+`. Is that a bug?
Cheers,
Asumu
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
