On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Dmitry Pavlov <dpav...@ipa.nw.ru> wrote:
> > > "In hindsight, the use of quad precision appears to have been overly > > conservative for this problem" > > Might be, and may still be, but the precision of astronomical > observation has grown much since the time the paper was > written, and so have the requirements to the ephemeris. > It seems to me that before you just "throw bits at it" that you might want to estimate the error. -- ~jrm
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
