The simulation collection uses continuations extensively - in essence it is a continuation engine - and I get very good performance from it, even for very large simulations.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > On Sep 16, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Patrick Useldinger wrote: > >> Which makes me wonder if continuations are really usable in Racket (in terms >> of performance)? > > > That is a good question, and the answer is 'yes, in the right situation'. I > think the use in the generator code might be not the right situation. -- > Matthias > > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users