A tiny, not very important question:
1. for/fold documentation:
(for/fold ([sum 0]
[rev-roots null])
([i '(1 2 3 4)])
(values (+ sum i) (cons (sqrt i) rev-roots)))
2. emacs default indent:
(for/fold ([sum 0]
[rev-roots null])
([i '(1 2 3 4)])
(values (+ sum i) (cons (sqrt i) rev-roots)))
3. DrRacket default indent:
(for/fold ([sum 0]
[rev-roots null])
([i '(1 2 3 4)])
(values (+ sum i) (cons (sqrt i) rev-roots)))
I prefer 1. I don't hate 2 but sometimes wonder if I should hand
indent it to 1, or, if is there some magic N for "(put 'for/fold
'scheme-indent-function N)" in emacs that I haven't discovered yet.
I'm curious what other people do? (I suppose "not care" is one valid choice?)
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
