On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Greg Hendershott <greghendersh...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's a good point, Tobias. > > I'd actually be fine with `define-logger' acting like > `define/provide-logger' -- just go ahead and provide them all. > > Because I don't see opacity being such a useful option for a logger, > as opposed to something like a struct?
I wanted a more log4j or python logging system and started to put together a library to do what I wanted. https://github.com/samdphillips/racket-utils/blob/master/logging.rkt Cheers, Sam ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
