If in-effect were a macro, you'd avoid the ugly lambda ().
On Aug 3, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote: > 2012/8/3 Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu>: >> More precisely, evaluation of the `in-value' call is evaluated once, >> printing a dot and returning a sequence that contains #<void>. > > Would it make sense to include an in-effect ? > > https://github.com/soegaard/this-and-that/blob/master/heart-beat/in-effect.rkt > > -- > Jens Axel Søgaard > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
