On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Jon Zeppieri <[email protected]> wrote:
> It depends on what you're doing with these lists, but you might consider
> using integers, not lists, to represent the bit-strings. The representation
> is considerably more compact, and you can use bitwise ops to manipulate them.
Would Tony Garnock-Jones's bitsyntax PLaneT package be helpful here?
http://planet.racket-lang.org/package-source/tonyg/bitsyntax.plt/3/2/planet-docs/manual/index.html
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
