> Anyway, if you're dealing only with alists, you don't need to know about > "dict-keys" (whatever that is), just like you don't need to know about Justin > Bieber (whatever that is).
I was stuck in the abstraction "Dictionary", thinking I might need more of the API than just dict-keys. As it turns out I won't, and so using an alist as just an alist is better. And therefore: > (map car my-alist) is perfect for my needs. Thanks for the prod. And thanks also for the A-list for alists. > "cons", "car", "cdr", "pair?", "assq", "assoc", "member", named-"let", "map", > "reverse", "list", recursive procedures, "quasiquote"... Cheers, Kieron ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
