1. It's right in the docs for call-with-exception-handler:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/exns.html?q=call-with-exception-handler&q=with-handlers#(def._((lib._racket/private/more-scheme..rkt)._call-with-exception-handler))
2. Thanks for the pointer!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthias Felleisen" <matth...@ccs.neu.edu>
To: "Rüdiger Asche" <r...@ruediger-asche.de>
Cc: "users" <users@racket-lang.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [racket] again: timeouts and exceptions
1. I don't know where this prose is but it reads rather confusing.
2. If I were you, I'd use an escape continuation rather than an exception
handler here. What you seem to want is flow of control, and let/ec is the
right tool then.
On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Rüdiger Asche wrote:
Hi there,
a few of you recommended to implement timeouting reads via sync/timeout.
That works neat, but it would be even nicer to combine this w/ exception
handling, like so:
...
((readbytetimeout)
(lambda (port)
(if (sync/timeout READTIMEOUT inport)
(read-byte inport)
(raise "read-byte" #t))))
...
((readsomething) ..... (readbytetimeout) ......
(letrec ((repl (lambda ()
(dosomethingthatmustexecuteperiodically)
(let ((readresult
(call-with-exception-handler HandlerFn
(readsomething))))
(repl)))))
(repl))
Iow, I want the REPL to always be operational but restart from the
beginning when the innermost read timeouts so that the periodic
computations get their turn.
I didn't get this to work though because according to the docs, "If the
exception handler returns a value when invoked by raise, then raise
propagates the value to the “previous” exception handler (still in the
dynamic extent of the call to raise, and under the same barrier, if any)."
That is true; I get thrown back out of the entire thing because the
default uncaught exception handler is called. What ectually does it mean
"IF the
exception handler..." How is it possible for a function NOT to return a
value?
Any return value including #f and () will propagate the exception to the
default handler; I simply want to stop it where it is.
What do I need to do (or paraphrased: What is the necessary implementation
of HandlerFn) in order to get this to work? Or do I need yet another
control flow or handling mechanism?
Thanks!
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
