We *all* had it just before 00:00 UTC, about 110 minutes ago. I'm afraid you wasted your second.
8^) 2012/7/1, Todd O'Bryan <toddobr...@gmail.com>: > Hey, now. Some of us haven't had that extra second, yet. Don't ruin it > for us. :-) > > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Pierpaolo Bernardi <olopie...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> I want in racket all that my hp50g can do. >> >> And since you are at it, you could also port the combinatorica library >> to racket. >> >> I hope all of you have enjoyed the extra second we have just had today! >> Cheers! >> >> P. >> >> >> 2012/7/1, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com>: >>> Being a glutton for punishment, I've decided to write a `math' >>> collection to be shipped with Racket. I'm writing it in Typed Racket, so >>> Typed Racket programs that `(require math)' can apply mathematical >>> functions with no overhead and regular Racket programs will incur only >>> the usual contract checks. Also, Vincent's TR optimizer will fill the >>> math collection with rainbows and sunshine. >>> >>> I know what *I* want in a math library: statistics (for my research) and >>> basic linear algebra (for `plot'). What do *you* want? >>> >>> (FWIW, this started with Antonio asking for inverse hyperbolic functions >>> on the dev mailing list. I just did those today, and factorial, >>> log-factorial, gamma, and log-gamma yesterday.) >>> >>> Neil ⊥ >>> ____________________ >>> Racket Users list: >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >>> >> >> -- >> Inviato dal mio dispositivo mobile >> >> ____________________ >> Racket Users list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > -- Inviato dal mio dispositivo mobile ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
