> > Looking at this smaller example, I think that the nested recursion in > expansion of `for*/list` is confusing Typed Racket. I'll look into > why that is, and if it can be fixed. In the meantime, you ought to be > able to rewrite the loop to use `for/fold:` and `reverse` to work > around this issue. >
Ok, I won't use for*/list: then. Thanks a lot for your help, Sam ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
