At Tue, 15 May 2012 10:49:20 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > ISSUE 1: I am disturbed that submodule b is evaluated before submodule a.
I've long resisted defining the order in which `require'd modules are instantiated, but let's try it. I'll push a change so that instantiation of a module instantiates its `require'd modules in the order in which they are `require'd. (Surprising to me, the only thing that I saw break with this change was a test in the module test suite.) Keep in mind that relying on the instantiation order is still generally a bad idea. Also, `require'd modules are still instantiated before the module body expressions are evaluated (and I don't think we should try to change that), so running #lang racket (module one racket/base 1) (module three racket/base 3) (require 'one) 2 (require 'three) prints 1, 3, 2, not 1, 2, 3. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
