I'm not aware of any licensing problem with Racket, when distributing
closed-source commercial ".exe" apps as you described.
by using a free version of Racket, I wouldn't have any possibility to
delegate the issue to the developers of Racket (which is fine with me
because Racket from racket-lang.org is free).
I suggest considering two things: (1) the long history of the core
Racket (PLT) developers providing good releases and good support; and
(2) the option of delegating to a professional consultant if any
problems arise.
If I saw an advantage to having a commercial Racket distribution, I
would've done it already. But I think my clients are best served by
staying with the canonical Racket distribution (built from source).
Neil V.
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
