Impressive improvement!  Thanks Matthias.

-Joe


On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu>wrote:

>
> I believe the code below cuts your running time to one third. -- Matthias
>
> #lang racket
>
> (require srfi/13)
>
> (define (euler4e)
>  (for*/fold ([greatest 0]) ([first (in-range 101 1000)] [second (in-range
> first 1000)])
>     (define prod (* first second))
>     (if (palindromic? prod) (max greatest prod) greatest)))
>
> (define (palindromic? n)
>  (define s (number->string n))
>  (define r (string-reverse s))
>  (string=? s r))
>
>
____________________
  Racket Users list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Reply via email to