On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Gary Baumgartner <g...@cs.toronto.edu> wrote:
> On a more productive note: in Racket code I define and use 'implies' a lot,
>  often conjoined, for predicates. It's mainly of declarative value, which is
>  perhaps why it's uncommon in implementation despite how common it is in
>  specification. And for boolean expressions in general I also use 'neither'.
>  Are these something that others [would] use and so could be added to Racket's
>  library?

Seems to me adding implies, nand, and nor to racket/bool is a good idea.

Let me know if you disagree (and if you disagree after I've already
committed, it is a simple thing to drop the commit or change it).

Robby

____________________
  Racket Users list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Reply via email to