Re: [racket] constructing a boolean that's a filter for a given type? could be automatic?

[Matthias Felleisen]

On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:

>  Perhaps it should just have less information.


I like that a lot. 

____________________
  Racket Users list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users