At Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:56:24 -0200, Rodolfo Carvalho wrote: > I'm not actually using MysterX, but for what I understood, shouldn't the > above sentence read the opposite? > > "... porting from `mysterx' to `ffi/com' (the new implementation) will be > encouraged."
Right - thanks! ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
