At Thu, 5 Jan 2012 09:10:49 -0800, John Clements wrote: > I just had trouble with the type of log; I wanted to pass it a > positive real, and get back a Real. After inspecting the type, I see > that it works for Positive-Float. Is this deliberate, in order to get > more optimizable code (if the input is a float, we don't need to check > it), or just an oversight? If the former, it seems like there should > be some easier way to deliver this information to the user.
That's an oversight. I'll fix it. Thanks for the report! Vincent ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
