J G Cho wrote at 12/12/2011 06:49 PM:
Just for the readability, is it possible to write
some-list
(proc-1 some-list)
(proc-2 (val-of-last-expression))
...
(proc-n (val-of-last-expression)) ;where n is 'largeish'
If you are interacting in XRepl, you can do this:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/xrepl/index.html?q=xrepl#%28part._past-vals%29
You can also define a new "#lang" or syntactic form that does this.
Whether using this would be more "readable" than nesting the expressions
the usual way, I could not say.
It might also be the case that these is a better way do solve your
particular concrete problem, rather than either "largeish N" nested
procedure applications or breaking the usual syntactic clarity of Racket.
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
