> Stack Overflow Stack Exchange.
As I said, "same difference". :) On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Greg Hendershott <greghendersh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Although it's for port 25 not 80, I think same difference -- this > Stack Overflow Q&A might be helpful: > > http://serverfault.com/questions/265971/change-port-to-which-local-mail-is-delivered > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Jordan Schatz <jor...@noionlabs.com> wrote: >> What is considered the best way to run a web server as non-root and >> accept connections on port 80? >> >> I believe Apache handles it by being started as root, binding to the >> port, and then dropping privileges. I don't think that the racket web >> server knows to drop any privileges? >> >> I'm guessing that common practice is to use iptables to redirect to a >> high numbered port? What about iptables lack of support for IPv6 NAT? are >> there any commonly used work arounds? >> >> Thanks, >> Jordan >> _________________________________________________ >> For list-related administrative tasks: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
