Well, a number is a seq of length 1, I suppose. Although my brain thinks list or vector when it sees the term...
I had to skip v5.1.2 due to some incomprehensible error. Other than this and plot module providing a new proc 'inverse' which caused minor errors, it seems to work really well. Change from cmd-T to cmd-R is greatly appreciated. Thank you. On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > Yes, that change was part of v5.1.2. An exact nonnegative integer N can > be used as a sequence equivalent to `(in-range N)', so that > > (for ([i 10]) ...) > > iterates `i' from 0 to 9. > > At Wed, 9 Nov 2011 23:20:37 -0700, Jay McCarthy wrote: >> It is intentional. It broke mongodb too, but I forget what the >> justification was. I think Matthew made the chance... but I forget >> when. >> >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:35 PM, J G Cho <g...@fundingmatters.com> wrote: >> > Congrats to the new release. >> > >> > Some of my tests were failing under 5.2 >> > >> > Upon some poking around, I find (sequence? 2) now return #t is the >> > culprit. Is this change intentional? If so, why? >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > jgc >> > _________________________________________________ >> > For list-related administrative tasks: >> > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> >> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University >> http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay >> >> "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 >> >> _________________________________________________ >> For list-related administrative tasks: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
