Thanks for the example! I agree that there's a bug here, and I'm still investigating.
At Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:57:57 +0100, "nicolas.o...@gmail.com" wrote: > Dear all, > > Following on my memory leak problem, I managed to minimise my program. > And I still don't understand why it leaks. > > Here is a minimised example: > > (define prompt1 (make-continuation-prompt-tag 'p1)) > (define prompt2 (make-continuation-prompt-tag 'p2)) > > (define (capture-and-abort prompt-tag) > (call-with-composable-continuation > (lambda (k) (abort-current-continuation prompt-tag k)) > prompt-tag)) > > (define (test i) > (call-with-continuation-prompt > (lambda () > (call-with-continuation-prompt > (lambda() > (for ((j i)) > (capture-and-abort prompt1) > (capture-and-abort prompt2))) > prompt2)) > prompt1)) > > (test 100000) > > Calling test with any number 100 000 or higher will allocate memory very > fast. > What is the reason for that and how can I solve this? > > Best regards, > > Nicolas. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
