Is there a better data type to tangle them with?

I considered multiple values, but those were cumbersome to save because (values v ...) isn't a first-class value. Saving and restoring multiple parameters is the main reason to use a parameter list.

I tried making structs, but that forced me into making a 'define-parameter-list' macro instead of a 'parameter-list' function. I wanted as much similarity with parameters as possible.

It turned out that 'list*' and 'append' have well-known semantics that correspond nicely with extending and combining parameter lists.

I suppose I could use a prefab struct instead.

Neil T

On 10/20/2011 09:59 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
Good. I'm glad we avoided the unknown boogeyman.

But I don't see why you need tangle lists and these things.

Robby

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Neil Toronto<neil.toro...@gmail.com>  wrote:
On 10/20/2011 08:08 AM, Robby Findler wrote:

Well, what about the current-namespace? The output ports? It seems
dangerous and leak introducing (possibly).

I don't actually have an example where it could cause a problem tho. But
you might try to think thru the ramifications by searing for "current-"
in the docs.

I still think using a thread wouldn't be a problem. But you convinced me
yesterday that it could become a problem in the future.

So I invented parameter lists. Creating a plot pict looks like this now:

    (define saved-parameters (plot-parameters))
    (dc (λ (dc x y)
          (parameterize/list ([plot-parameters  saved-parameters])
            (plot/dc renderer-tree dc x y width height ...)))
        width height)

Some example tests:

    (define p1 (make-parameter 1))
    (define p2 (make-parameter 2))
    (define ps1 (parameter-list p1 p2))

    (check-equal? (ps1) (list 1 2))
    (check-equal? (parameterize/list ([ps1  (list 10 20)]) (ps1))
                  (list 10 20))
    (check-equal? (parameterize ([p1 10] [p2 20]) (ps1))
                  (list 10 20))
    (check-equal? (parameterize/list ([ps1  (list 10 20)])
                    (list (p1) (p2)))
                  (list 10 20))

    (ps1 (list 10 20))

    (check-equal? (ps1) (list 10 20))

Rules:

    ((parameter-list p ...)) = (list (p) ...)

    ((parameter-list p ...) (list v ...)) = (begin (p v) ...)

    (parameterize/list ([(parameter-list p ...)  (list v ...)]) e ...)
     = (parameterize ([p v] ...) e ...)

    ((parameter-list* p ... pl)) = (list* (p) ... (pl))

    ((parameter-list-append pl ...)) = (append (pl) ...)

I know Blake has wanted these before, so I might throw them into unstable.

Neil T


_________________________________________________
 For list-related administrative tasks:
 http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Reply via email to